Bliar is off his rocker
I almost fell off my chair when I read Tony Bliars latest contribution to historical revisionism and theology. His newest offering includes:
To me, the most remarkable thing about the Koran is how progressive it is. I write with great humility as a member of another faith.
What a pathological liar, if hes a man of faith then Bush is an intellectual giant. The fact that he chooses Christmas day as the date to release this third rate appeasement/apology for Islam shows how much faith he has. Nowhere does he mention the spiritual signicance of the Nativity, but he finds time to comment on the progressiveness of the Koran.
As an outsider, the Koran strikes me as a reforming book, trying to return Judaism and Christianity to their origins, much as reformers attempted to do with the Christian church centuries later.
If he is a man of faith, then why is he denigrating his own faith by claiming that Christianity needed to be 'returned to its origins', and that Islam was the one to do it? Why isnt he a Muslim then...
The Koran is inclusive.
Looks like he hasnt read it then. Probably just got some snippets from his PR team to quote when hes on the subject of the religion of peace.
It extols science and knowledge and abhors superstition.
I'll have some concrete quotes to counter this some time soon.
It is practical and far ahead of its time in attitudes toward marriage, women, and governance.
Which begs the question why isnt Tony asking us to adopt their 'practical' methods of governance. Well actually he is doing his best by overseeing the Islamification of Britain. Mind you one 'practical' method of governance was to impose a tax on all non-Muslims in Muslim lands, so maybe Bliars planning on introducing a tax on Muslims. Fat chance.
Under its guidance, the spread of Islam and its dominance over previously Christian or pagan lands were breathtaking. Over centuries, Islam founded an empire and led the world in discovery, art, and culture.
Scarcely has there been a more stagnant empire in history. Again I'll go into this in greater depth when I have the time.
The standard-bearers of tolerance in the early Middle Ages were far more likely to be found in Muslim lands than in Christian ones.
'Standard-bearers of tolerance'. This guy is a lunatic. Mohammed said: 'Two religions shall not remain together in the peninsula of the Arabs'. Hows that for tolerance, but we're supposed to let them come and impose themselves on us.
We have to show that our values are not Western, still less American or Anglo-Saxon, but values in the common ownership of humanity, universal values that should be the right of the global citizen.
For universal values read no values- access to condoms is more important than babies being killed in their mothers wombs.
The danger with the United States today is not that it is too involved in the world. The danger is that it might pull up the drawbridge and disengage. The world needs it involved. The world wants it engaged.
The world wants it engaged just like it wants a nuclear holocaust. And if the last 50 years are an example of the US not being involved, God help us when they decide to 'get involved'.
Our values are our guide. They represent humanity's progress throughout the ages. At each point we have had to fight for them and defend them. As a new age beckons, it is time to fight for them again.
Its time to fight for our values by fighting against people like you........you have the blood of hundreds of thousands on your hands you treacherous, lying, sorry excuse for a puppet. You're right when you say God will judge you, I wouldnt be too sure that you'll be getting the judgement you're expecting though.
What most annoys me about Blairs perverse world view is that he tries to twist reality so that it conforms to his agenda. In actual fact hes as clueless about Islam (or lying, take your pick) as the head mistress in my previous blog entry:
Political radicals became religious radicals and vice versa.
Those in power tried to accommodate this Islamic radicalism by incorporating some of its leaders and some of its ideology. The result was nearly always disastrous. Religious radicalism was made respectable and political radicalism suppressed, and so in the minds of many, the two came together to represent the need for change. They began to think that the way to restore the confidence and stability of Islam was through a combination of religious extremism and populist politics
Anyone who knows the slightest thing about Islam could tell Bliar that Islam has always been a political religion. It has a blueprint for government and judiciary. There wasnt one historical moment when the beautiful spirituality of Islam was supplanted by extremists who tried to politicise it. It always was political. That mythical moment only exists in Bliars brain. But supposedly hes more intimately familiar with Islam than Muslims themselves. As Fazlur Rahman, a well respected Muslim scholar said:
Islam insisted on the assumption of political power since it regarded itself as the repository of the Will of God which had to be worked on earth through a political order
Mullah Bliar has clearly recieved some new revelation which abrogates this old Islamic view.
But let us remember that extremism is not the true voice of Islam. Millions of Muslims the world over want what all people want: to be free and for others to be free. They regard tolerance as a virtue and respect for the faith of others as a part of their own faith.
Telling people what to believe again. Sorry but Muslims dont follow Blairite Islam. Just today I read this. This 'refugee' who crossed God knows how many safe countries (according to international law he should have sought asylum in the first one, so he shouldn't even be in Europe, yet alone Denmark) has the audacity to proclaim:
"We're the ones who will change you,"
It will remain forever unclear to me why people who have the audacity to utter such provocative statements are not immediately deported out of Europe. He is absolutely right when he says:
"western thinking" as formed by the values held by leaders of western or non-islamic nations. Its "materialism, egoism and wildness" has altered Christianity
But his vision of an Islamic Europe is not the antidote to the problem. A healthy European country who had a backbone would have chucked this guy back into Arabia years ago. But the Europe of old is AWOL, and in its disorientated state it niether knows what it stands for or against, all the time taking needless blows from the rear from a problem that could be dealt with within 1 day.
"Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes," Krekar said.
Well if they describe themselves as mosquitoes who am I to argue. I'll be using this quote in the future.
"Every western woman in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim woman in the same countries are producing 3.5 children. "By 2050, 30 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim."
This could all be solved in no time at all. Europe to the Europeans, our 'guests' have outstayed their welcome, its time to ask them to leave. Failing that we should forcibly evict them.